Oracle Trust Model
OmegaX needs a stronger oracle model than a simple single-signer price feed.
Why
Health and coverage-relevant events can involve:
- noisy longitudinal behavior
- private clinical inputs
- claims evidence
- review and challenge requirements
- different trust standards across product families
That means OmegaX needs explicit oracle policy, not implicit trust.
Roles OmegaX should support
Over time, OmegaX should be able to distinguish roles such as:
- outcome oracle
- quote oracle
- premium attestation oracle
- claim-evidence oracle
- adjudication or review oracle
- risk-reporting oracle
Not every plan needs every role, but the model should be able to express them.
That flexibility matters because a low-friction reward plan and a higher-trust coverage plan should not be forced into exactly the same oracle assumptions.
Trust profiles by product type
Different product families can justify different oracle policy:
- faster reward flows may tolerate simpler quorum and lower-friction review
- sponsor-led plans may need stronger auditability and clearer operator separation
- protection and coverage products may need stronger evidence discipline
- more regulated participation may need richer challenge and escalation paths
These should still be different policies over one shared health-plan foundation, not entirely different protocols.
Finality lifecycle
Long-range oracle finality should make these steps legible:
- event observed
- event normalized into a recognized schema
- attestation submitted
- threshold or policy condition reached
- optional challenge or review window
- finality recorded
- downstream settlement unlocked
Evidence commitments
OmegaX does not need raw evidence onchain.
It does need:
- signer identity
- policy and role boundaries
- evidence commitments
- finality consequences
That is how the system stays private without becoming opaque.
It also gives OmegaX a path to auditability without forcing raw records or raw claims evidence onto a public chain.
Disputes and challenge windows
Not every plan needs a heavy dispute path, but the architecture needs room for:
- conflicting evidence
- late corrections
- suspect AI-assisted interpretation
- higher-trust claim and coverage products
External attestation rails
External public attestation systems can help around the protocol, for example with:
- operator credentials
- model or execution-environment claims
- upstream review receipts
They should complement OmegaX trust policy, not replace it.
OmegaX still needs its own plan-level oracle policy, finality rules, and settlement discipline even when outside attestation systems are useful around the edges.